(#el5mh5a) @cel any takers to help me with this work? 🤔

(#el5mh5a) @prologic eight people interacted (six stars/favourites and four boosts/reblogs) but no replies that I see.

(#el5mh5a) @prologic What's your current plan/concept on this?

(#el5mh5a) @ocdtrekkie Not sure yet 🤗

(#el5mh5a) But.... I'm a bit more convinced that it _might_ be possible to create a Twtxt <-> ActivityPub bridge as a separate optional (opt-in) service for Yarn.social users -- Hell I _think_ it might be possible in general for any self-hosted Twtxt users that self-host their own feed (_without `yarnd`_).

(#el5mh5a) @prologic Awesome. We need to catch up. Hoping to make it tomorrow maybe.

@prologic (#el5mh5a) that would be very nice, and remove the need to have more services running. I think it would attract more people to run this to use that, sunce yarnd is very easy to set up and run.

(#el5mh5a) @stigatle Do you think it should directly be integrated into `yarnd` or a separate service / binary / project? 🤔 Opt-in or Opt-out?

@prologic (#el5mh5a) personally I would like it integrated and opt-in. just enable with a flag when starting up yarnd.

@prologic (#el5mh5a) a separate binay would work too, maybe yarnd could just start it. if its a separate project - then it could possibly be useful for others as well? Im not sure, Im just thinking - the easier it is to set up and run - the better it is for everyone. Im sure it can be easy to set up and use either way.