@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org 100% agree. Fun fact: Couldn’t we actually do that? I mean timestamp \t twt-id \t reply-id \t text. Older clients would just include the IDs in the message, but they wouldn’t break. (I should shut up about extending the format, though. I was super skeptical about @prologic@twtxt.net’s twtxt.net extensions at first and voiced my opinion on various occasions. I see it a bit differently now, especially since the original twtxt community appears to be pretty much dead, so … maybe there’s room for twtxt 2.0? Maybe not? I don’t know. I don’t want this little community to divide even more. 😨)