@deadguy (#xfsjdlq) I think the advantage of using twtxt.net over your own twtxt.txt is that you get the nice interface that @prologic and others built here and also the nice Goryon app that @dooven have built. If you really want to own your twtxt and still have all these features and the app I suggest you to install the twtxt software (same software that twtxt.net and twt.social pods use) on a machine you control.
matched #7dl5pzq score:6.09
Search by:
Search by 3 mentions:
@deadguy (#aqy2xvq) no.
I am king birb because I signed up earlier than you guys.
I am king birb, and my subjects are ones that join after me.
so I would say, my Kingdom has a population of around 10 people.
matched #r4pricq score:10.55
Search by:
Search by 1 mentions:
@deadguy (#xfsjdlq) there isnβt a way to import an existing feed yet, except manually which I can do if you want. But I will file an issue because this has come up a number of times and I think itβs a useful feature to add! π
matched #smzhomq score:10.55
Search by:
Search by 1 mentions:
@deadguy (#xfsjdlq) Yes it's all possible. We haven't built this support yet, but it is something I want to do! Do you have any experience writing Go? If so we would love the contributions! The way I was thinking of this working is to extend the command-line client we have today (`twt`) into both a traditional Twtxt client that mutates a local `twtxt.txt` file but also knows how to connect to a Twt.social pod. The expected workflow would be an (_optionaly_) occasional `twt login` and `twt sync`. What do you think?
matched #36nfz6q score:10.55
Search by:
Search by 1 mentions: