Sort by: Newest, Oldest, Most Relevant
(#oyi5iua) @prologic Having to deal with json and cryptography is not very appealing to me. It's the simplicity and hackability of twtxt.txt that I'm drawn by. That you can in fact handwrite your posts and you can throw pretty much anything at it after the datetime+tab and it still being somewhat human readable and work in most clients. If you do something that a client does not like, then you will have to take up the debate with the devs or make your own. And if people like some features that you invented, then your new client might get more users, or your end up doing something just or for yourself.

matched #4xhijva score:11.7 Search by:
Search by 1 mentions:
Search by 1 tags:
(#oyi5iua) I'm not super a fan of using json. I feel we could still use text as the medium. Maybe a modified version to fix any weakness. What if instead of signing each twt individually we generated a merkle tree using the twt hashes? Then a signature of the root hash. This would ensure the full stream of twts are intact with a minimal overhead. With the added bonus of helping clients identify missing twts when syncing/gossiping. Have two endpoints. One as the webfinger to link profile details and avatar like you posted. And the signature for the merkleroot twt. And the other a pageable stream of twts. Or individual twts/merkle branch to incrementally access twt feeds.

matched #6hssfeq score:11.7 Search by:
Search by 1 tags:
(#oyi5iua) I'm not super a fan of using json. I feel we could still use text as the medium. Maybe a modified version to fix any weakness. What if instead of signing each twt individually we generated a merkle tree using the twt hashes? Then a signature of the root hash. This would ensure the full stream of twts are intact with a minimal overhead. With the added bonus of helping clients identify missing twts when syncing/gossiping. Have two endpoints. One as the webfinger to link profile details and avatar like you posted. And the signature for the merkleroot twt. And the other a pageable stream of twts. Or individual twts/merkle branch to incrementally access twt feeds.

matched #fujqeeq score:11.7 Search by:
Search by 1 tags:
πŸ’‘ **Quick 'n Dirty prototype Yarn.social protocol/spec:** > If we were to decide to write a new spec/protocol, what would it look like? Here's my rough draft (_back of paper napkin idea_): - Feeds are JSON file(s) fetchable by standard HTTP clients over TLS - WebFinger is used at the root of a user's domain (or multi-user) lookup. e.g: `prologic@mills.io` -> `https://yarn.mills.io/~prologic.json` - Feeds contain similar metadata that we're familiar with: Nick, Avatar, Description, etc - Feed items are signed with a ED25519 private key. That is all "posts" are cryptographically signed. - Feed items continue to use content-addressing, but use the full Blake2b Base64 encoded hash. - Edited feed items produce an "Edited" item so that clients can easily follow Edits. - Deleted feed items produced a "Deleted" item so that clients can easily delete cached items. #Yarn.social #Protocol #Ideas

matched #oyi5iua score:11.7 Search by:
Search by 3 tags:
(#oyi5iua) Son in theory we _could_ have a `yarn.txt` feed and a stripped-down and limited `twtxt.txt` feed. But I am 98% convinced this wouldn't solve any of the perceived problems, actually I'm 100% certain. Mostly because there are no offered solutions, no actionable feedback, no contributions, just complains and arguments.

matched #pa6pc3a score:11.7 Search by:
Search by 1 tags:
This is twtxt search engine and crawler. Please contact Support if you have any questions, concerns or feedback!