How many forks deep is this Bitcoin conversation? As @movq said: > Step 1, someone builds something which doesn’t support a “reply” feature at all. Step 2, the thing grows, now people want “reply”. Step 3, it gets confusing with all the linear replies and now people want “full threading”. That’s also basically what happened to twtxt/yarn. Maybe, over time, everything evolves into Usenet. @prologic, step 3 when? :)

(#thqi7sq) @mckinley LOL it's great isn't it and all completely decentralized and spread across so many feeds 😆

(#thqi7sq) @prologic decentralized forum when?

(#thqi7sq) @justamoment Don't we already have that now? I'd it's just a matter of style and presentation we can do things around that 😆

(#thqi7sq) @justamoment +1

(#thqi7sq) @prologic damn, your reply got me an idea... What if you can use a thread as discussion externally? I was actually searching for something similar around for myself for curiosity. Think of it like a widget similar to Disqus. You can embed a discussion on your site like a comment system. It might even help spread the use of twtxt with people who don't know of it.

(#thqi7sq) @mckinley … 😅 For reference, this is how it looks like on my end (after having zoomed out quite a lot):

(#thqi7sq) Very beautiful @movq

(#thqi7sq) @mckinley I think I counted just five levels, when scrolling over it. Zoomed out as far as my terminal allowed: Conversation in tt

(#thqi7sq) @lyse wow that’s a beast. 😅