(#v5yaeha) @prologicFor example, this should work (no idea if it does).

…: #v5yaeha) @prologic @lyse @anth One way to make the raw txt easier to read would be to move the (hash) to the end of the line. Another thing would be to add `re:` to it so it would be cleared that c…

(#v5yaeha) I don't have any issue with the (foo) subjects, it's the proliferation of the (foo url) tags. They're just too long and ugly.

(#v5yaeha) @prologic Looks like twtxt.net is already happy with it, so that's good! I'm just going to aim for that.

(#v5yaeha) Indeed, using the shortest form possible (see this twt) would be nice. I’ll change my client accordingly. 👍

(#v5yaeha) @lyse Yes, I often read the raw messages. But more to the point, the simplicity of the format is the bulk of the appeal.

(#v5yaeha) @prologic Exactly, but that reduces the argument for URLs in the post. The client should figure out how to search based on the hashtag.

(#v5yaeha) @lyse How _could_ they be made "more elegant"? 🤔 Is it just a presentation thing? (UX)?

@anth (#v5yaeha) I was reluctant, too, at first, but proper threading seriously improves the twtxt experience. This should have been built-in from the start.

@prologic @vain (#v5yaeha) This captures my sentiments on both points absolutely perfectly! 😁🤗