(#wilgbuq) FWIW "English" is not a "standard" It is a spoken and written language.

(#wilgbuq) @adi standards

(#wilgbuq) @adi Twitter is wrong 😆 !!!

(#wilgbuq) @adi No mate this is not my opinion at all. If you can't agree to standards and follow them, then what hope do we have in this industry. Seriously mate, follow the standards and if you actually intend to construct URIs with a `!` in them, that's fine, just understand that is a totally valid URI.

(#wilgbuq) > Yarn surpasses Twitter in number of users, read all about in on vs > Yarn surpasses Twitter in number of users, read all about in on Twitter treats the exclamation mark as punctuation btw

(#wilgbuq) And I know you don't "expect" anything from me, so that's cool too 😂 But also if you "prefer" `yarnd` did something about these broken links, I will not 😂

(#wilgbuq) @prologic I wonder if it's a good idea to assume that punctuation marks at the end of the url are not part of the url, they're more commonly punctuation marks? > Is this the correct url

(#wilgbuq) @prologic So you'd rather respect the URI standard rather than English punctuation?

(#wilgbuq) @adi that hedgedoc is really cool.

(#wilgbuq) @adi No! That's not a good idea at all, that is in direction violation of the Uniform Resource Identifier standard. > The path component contains data, usually organized in hierarchical > form, that, along with data in the non-hierarchical query component > (Section 3.4), serves to identify a resource within the scope of the > URI's scheme and naming authority (if any). The path is terminated > by the first question mark ("?") or number sign ("#") character, or by the end of the URI.