@quark @fastidious @prologic (#wkjlotq) Yeah, jenny's subject hash links seem to be off in regards to the URL.

(#wkjlotq) @movq I _thought_ we were dropping the `#` linking of Twt Subject Hashes now? 🙃

@quark (#wkjlotq) Fixing old entries is tricky and I wouldn’t do it. If you change something in an old twt, it will change its hash sum – and thus, it will break threading if someone has replied to your old twt or otherweise referenced it. 😵

@movq (#wkjlotq) Nice one 👌

@quark (#wkjlotq) No we haven’t changed it at all! 👌 But we have extended it wiyh backwards compatible extensions 👍

@movq (#wkjlotq) Exactly, @prologic told me in IRC about this the other day, so I adjusted `tt`. Prior to that I just generated twtxt.net/conv URLs for the subject hash link. If I feel like it tomorrow, I'll send a MR. But please, you can go for it as well. :-)

(#wkjlotq) Hmmm I see 🤔 I’m not even sure where those links are coming from 😳 I’ll dig in to it tomorrow 👌

@movq (#wkjlotq) Looking good.

@movq (#wkjlotq) Do I need to do a search and replace on my feed to fix old entries? Thanks for quick fix!

(#wkjlotq) Nope, not being treated as a 2nd class citizen at all 🤣 There it is right there in their feeds! From @movq : ``` 2021-10-16T12:12:18Z @ (#) No idea, sorry, I’ve never customized mutt’s colors to that extent. 🤔 ``` From @quark : ``` 2021-10-16T12:05:31Z (#) Oof! I found a bug on Yarn's Markdown rendering, @. See OP. ``` I guess something has changed in `jenny`?