(#3rhsaxa) @xuu I'm not so convinced of this "prefixing" here... We're sort of euplidating that extra bit of information anyway in the `rel`(s) -- Maybe @abucci is right and we stick to the spirit of the spec and an alias is just that, another identifier that is the same as this one. For example in `yarnd` we could add support in Settings for adding other "identities" that are the same as your, so a webfinger for `prologic@twtxt.net` _could_ also have `prologic@shortcircuit.net.au` and `james@mills.io` as aliases?
matched #3xh2ooa score:11.63
Search by:
Search by 2 mentions:
(#3rhsaxa) @xuu that doesn't seem to fit the spirit of the spec, at least by my read (I could be wrong obv). The example on Wikipedia's webfinger page,
```json
{
"subject": "acct:bob@example.com",
"aliases": [
"https://www.example.com/~bob/"
],
"properties": {
"http://example.com/ns/role": "employee"
},
"links": [{
"rel": "http://webfinger.example/rel/profile-page",
"href": "https://www.example.com/~bob/"
},
{
"rel": "http://webfinger.example/rel/businesscard",
"href": "https://www.example.com/~bob/bob.vcf"
}
]
}
```
and then the comparison with how mastodon uses webfinger,
```json
{
"subject": "acct:Mastodon@mastodon.social",
"aliases": [
"https://mastodon.social/@Mastodon",
"https://mastodon.social/users/Mastodon"
],
"links": [
{
"rel": "http://webfinger.net/rel/profile-page",
"type": "text/html",
"href": "https://mastodon.social/@Mastodon"
},
{
"rel": "self",
"type": "application/activity+json",
"href": "https://mastodon.social/users/Mastodon"
},
{
"rel": "http://ostatus.org/schema/1.0/subscribe",
"template": "https://mastodon.social/authorize_interaction?uri={uri}"
}
]
}
```
suggests to me you want to leave the `subject`/`acct` bit as is (don't add prefixes) and put extra information you care to include in the `links` section, where you're free to define the `rel` URIs however you see fit. The notion here is that webfinger is offering a mapping from an account name to additional information about that account, so if anything you'd use a `"subject": "acct:SALTY ACCOUNT_REPRESENTATION"` line in the JSON to achieve what you're saying if you don't want to do that via `links`.
matched #ape3gia score:11.63
Search by:
Search by 1 mentions:
(#3rhsaxa) @prologic Unfortunately the RFC's are a bit light in this regard. While it makes mention of different kinds of accounts like mailto: or status services.. it never combines them. It does make mention of using redirects to forward a request to other webfingers to provide additional detail.
I am kinda partial to using salty:acct:me@sour.is, yarn:acct:xuu@txt.sour.is, mailto:me@sour.is that could redirect to a specific service. and a parent account acct:me@sour.is that would reference them in some way. either in properties or aliases.
matched #q2baxsa score:11.63
Search by:
Search by 1 mentions:
(#3rhsaxa) @prologic Unfortunately the RFC's are a bit light in this regard. While it makes mention of different kinds of accounts like mailto: or status services.. it never combines them. It does make mention of using redirects to forward a request to other webfingers to provide additional detail.
I am kinda partial to using salty:acct:me@sour.is, yarn:acct:xuu@txt.sour.is, mailto:me@sour.is that could redirect to a specific service. and a parent account acct:me@sour.is that would reference them in some way. either in properties or aliases.
matched #y6wjdaq score:11.63
Search by:
Search by 1 mentions: